Real Estate CPA Tax Expert

The Latest Tax Law
Changes & Issues
 


Capital Gains Tax Strategy Analyzer Software


Business & Tax Entity
Selection Guide
Making the Right Choice

Worker, Homeownership, and Business Assistance Act of 2009

Chances of being audited

American Recovery &
Reinvestment Act of 2009

    Summary
   Part I - Businesses
   Part II
   Part III

   Part IV - Individuals
   Part V - Health Care

   Part VI - Energy Credits

Debt Forgiveness Rules
New Vehicle Tax Deduction
FY 2010 Budget Proposal
Net Operating Loss Planning
 Stabilization Tax Act
2008 Stabilization Tax Act
2008 Tax Act Key Changes
2009 Business Mileage Rate
IRA Tax Strategies
IRA/Roth Rollover
HSA 2009 Rates
Abandoned Securities
Partnership Fringe Benefits
2008 Individual Tax Changes
Zero Capital Gain Tax in 2008
Recent Tax Developments 2008
2008 Non-Business Tax Changes
2008 Recent Tax Developments
2008 Tax Stimulus Package
2008 Tax Stimulus Update
2008 Tax Stimulus - More Info
2007 Tax Law Changes
2007 Mortgage Forgiveness Act
2007 Technical Corrections Act
Prepaid Mortgage Ins Premiums
LLC and Employment Taxes
Spousal Partnership Rules
S Corporation Name Change
Payroll Taxes Recurring Item
HSA Comparability


Recurring item deduction exception allowed
for payroll taxes on bonuses and vacation pay

In a Revenue Procedure, IRS has provided a safe harbor accounting method for accrual method tax­payers that incur Federal Insurance Contributions Act (FICA) tax and Federal Unemployment Tax Act (FUTA) tax (i.e., payroll tax) liabilities for bonuses and vacation pay, as well as other compensation. Under the safe harbor, a taxpayer is treated as satisfying the requirements for the recurring item exception in Reg § 1.461-5(b)(1)(i) for its payroll tax liability in the same tax year in which all events have occurred that establish the fact of the compensation liability and the amount of the compensation liability can be determined with rea­sonable accuracy. Procedures are provided for taxpay­ers to obtain automatic IRS consent to change to this accounting method.

 

Background. Under Code Sec. 461(a), a deduction or credit must be taken for the tax year that is the prop­er tax year under the taxpayer's method of accounting used to compute its taxable income. Reg § 1.461­1(a)(2)(i) provides that under an accrual method of accounting, a liability is incurred, and is generally taken into account for tax purposes, in the tax year in which:

(1) all the events have occurred that establish the fact of the liability;

(2) the amount of the liability can be determined with reasonable accuracy; and

(3) economic performance has occurred with respect to the liability
(the "all events test").

Under the recurring item exception to the general rule of economic performance, a liability is treated as incurred for a tax year if­

... at the end of the tax year, all events have occurred that establish the fact of the liability and the amount can be determined with reasonable accuracy; (Reg § 1.461­5(b)(1)(i))

... economic performance occurs on or before the ear­lier of (i) the date that the taxpayer files a return (including extensions) for the tax year, or (ii) the 15th day of the ninth calendar month after the close of the tax year; (Reg § 1.461-5(b)(1)(ii))

... the liability is recurring in nature; (Reg § 1.461­5(b)(1 )(iii)) and

... either the amount of the liability is not material or accrual of the liability in the tax year results in better matching of the liability against the income to which it relates than would result from accrual of the liability in the tax year in which economic performance occurs. (Reg § 1.461-5(b)( I )(iv))

For many years, IRS's position was that FICA and FUTA taxes for accrual method taxpayers were incurred only in the tax year the compensation giving rise to the payroll tax liability was paid. However, IRS conceded the issue of deductibility of payroll taxes for year-end wages after the Court of Claims held in Eastman Kodak Co v. US., (Ct CI 1976) 37 AFTR 2d 76-1200, that an accrual employer could deduct its share of FICA and FUTA on year-end wages in the year they were accrued, rather than in the following year when they were paid. (Rev Rut 96-51, 1996-2 CB 36, Rev Rut 2007-12, 2007-11 IRB 685, see 2/22/2007 Weekly Alert, p. 85) However, the court in Eastman Kodak also held that the fact of the liability for payroll taxes on bonuses and vacation pay was not established in Year I because of the uncertainty at the end of Year I as to whether the employee will reach the payroll tax ceiling at the time of payment in Year 2.

Recognizing that the proper accrual of FICA and FUTA tax liabilities continues to be an area of uncer­tainty for taxpayers, IRS has provided a safe harbor for reasons of administrative convenience and to reduce further controversy.

Safe harbor accounting method. Rev Proc 2008-25 provides that solely for purposes of the recurring item exception in Reg § 1.461-5, a taxpayer will be treated as satisfying the requirement for the recurring item excep­tion in Reg § 1.461-5(b)(1)(i) for its payroll tax liability in the same tax year in which all events have occurred that establish the fact of the related compensation liabil­ity and the amount of the related compensation liability can be determined with reasonable accuracy. Rev Proc 2008-25 doesn't apply to an employee's portion of FICA tax imposed under Code Sec. 3101 and deducted by the employer from wages paid to the employee.

Illustration (1): Calendar year X uses an accrual accounting method, including the recurring item exception. X properly changes to the Rev Proc 2008-25 safe harbor for its payroll tax liabilities. During Year 1, X's employee A earns $10,000 of vested vacation compensation for services per­formed during Year L X pays the vacation compen­sation to A in February and May of Year 2. Assume that, as of Dec. 31 of Year 1, all events have occurred to establish the fact of X's vested vacation compensation liability and the amount of the liabil­ity is determinable with reasonable accuracy. Solely in applying the recurring item exception, all events necessary to establish the fact of the payroll tax lia­bility for the $10,000 vested vacation compensation incurred by X will be treated as having occurred in Year 1, and the amount of the payroll tax liability will be treated as being determined with reasonable accuracy in Year 1.

Illustration (2): Calendar year Y uses an accrual accounting method, including the recurring item exception. Y properly changes to the Rev Proc 2008-25 safe harbor for its payroll tax liabilities. On Dec. 28 of Year 1, Y's board of directors approves a bonus pool of $1,000,000 to be paid to Y's employ­ees for services provided during Year 1. The $1,000,000 bonuses are paid to Y's employees on Jan. 5 of Year 2. Assume that, as of Dec. 31 of Year 1, all events have occurred to establish the fact of the bonus compensation liability and the amount of the liability is determinable with reasonable accura­cy. Solely in applying the recurring item exception, all events necessary to establish the fact of the pay­roll tax liability for the $1,000,000 in bonuses incurred by Y will be treated as having occurred in Year 1, and the amount of the payroll tax liability will be treated as being determined with reasonable accuracy in Year 1.

Observation: Thus, taxpayers X and Y in Illustration (1) and (2) will be able to deduct their respective vacation pay and bonus compensation liability in Year 1.

A taxpayer within the scope of Rev Proc 2008-25 that wants to change its treatment of payroll tax liabili­ties to conform to the safe harbor method of accounting (including a change to use the recurring item exception for payroll tax liabilities) must follow the automatic change in accounting method provisions of Rev Proc 2002-9, 2002-1 CB 327, with the modifications speci­fied in Rev Proc 2008-25, Sec. 5.

Effective date. Rev Proc 2008-25 is effective for tax years ending on or after Dec. 31, 2007. IRS will not challenge a taxpayer's use of the safe harbor method on a return filed before Mar. ll, 2008, if the taxpayer meets the requirements of Rev Proc 2008-25 in that tax year. If the taxpayer's use of the safe harbor method on a return filed before Mar. 11, 2008, is an issue under consideration in examination, appeals, or before a fed­eral court, IRS will not further pursue the issue. (Reg § 1.461-5(b)(I)(i))